Director of a Company - Duties and Responsibilities (as well as Liability)

 Director Responsibility and Liability in Malaysia: Legal Framework and Case Law Implications

In Malaysia's corporate landscape, directors bear significant responsibilities and face various liabilities under the Companies Act 2016 (CA 2016), which replaced the Companies Act 1965. Understanding these legal obligations is crucial for directors to effectively discharge their duties while avoiding personal liability.

Fiduciary Duties of Directors

Directors serve as trustees and agents of the company, managing its affairs on behalf of shareholders. Section 213(1) of the CA 2016 codifies the fundamental duty that directors must exercise their powers "for a proper purpose and in good faith in the best interest of the company." This fiduciary relationship was aptly described in Great Eastern Ry v Turner (1872), where Lord Selbourne stated that directors are "trustees of the company's money and property; agents in the transactions which they enter into on behalf of the company." This principle establishes that directors must act honestly and avoid abusing their position.

Extract from CA2016

Duty of Care, Skill and Diligence
Under Section 213(2) of the CA 2016, directors must exercise "reasonable care, skill and diligence" in performing their duties. This standard is both subjective and objective, requiring directors to apply:
    • The knowledge, skill, and experience they actually possess
    • The knowledge, skill, and experience reasonably expected of someone in their position

The Business Judgment Rule

The CA 2016 provides protection through the business judgment rule in Section 214. Directors who make business judgments are deemed to have fulfilled their duty of care if they:
    • Make decisions for proper purposes in good faith
    • Have no material personal interest in the subject matter
    • Are reasonably informed about the matter
    • Reasonably believe the decision is in the company's best interest
This provision acknowledges that directors must take calculated risks, and protects them from liability for decisions that later prove unsuccessful, provided they acted properly.

Conflicts of Interest

Section 218(1) prohibits directors from using company property, information, or opportunities for personal gain without member approval. Additionally, directors must not compete with the company or use their position for personal advantage without proper authorization. Wong Kim Fatt v Leong & Co Sdn Bhd (1976) demonstrates the contractual force of company articles regarding directors' obligations, including provisions addressing conflicts.

Disclosure Requirements

Directors must disclose their interests in contracts or proposed contracts with the company. Failure to disclose can result in the director's office becoming vacant, as outlined in Article 72 of Table A (Fourth Schedule to the CA 1965), which remains relevant for companies that adopted it and haven't subsequently modified their constitution.

Restrictions on Financial Transactions

The CA 2016 places strict limitations on:
    • Loans to Directors: Section 224 generally prohibits companies from providing loans to directors unless exceptions apply. Directors who authorize prohibited loans face severe penalties - imprisonment up to five years or fines up to RM3 million or both.
    • Loans to Persons Connected with Directors: Section 225 extends similar restrictions to persons connected with directors, such as family members and associated companies.

Protections Against Liability

While directors face significant liabilities, certain protections exist:
    • Relief by Court: Section 581(1) allows courts to grant relief to directors who acted "honestly and reasonably" despite technical breaches of duty.
    • Indemnification: Section 289 permits companies to indemnify directors for costs in defending proceedings where judgment was given in their favor.
    • Whistleblower Protection: Section 587 protects directors who report violations of the CA 2016 or serious offenses involving fraud or dishonesty within the company.
However, Section 288 expressly voids any provision in the constitution or contract that attempts to exempt officers from liability for negligence, default, breach of duty, or breach of trust.

Legal Consequences of Breaches

The consequences of breaching director duties include:
    • Criminal Liability: Several provisions impose criminal penalties, including substantial fines and imprisonment.
    • Civil Liability: Directors may be personally liable to compensate the company for losses resulting from their breaches. In winding-up proceedings, Section 541 allows courts to order compensation from directors who breached their duties.
    • Disqualification: Directors may be disqualified from holding office for serious breaches.
The case of Howard v Patent Ivory (1888) illustrates that directors cannot rely on the rule in Turquand's case (which protects outsiders dealing with the company) if they're insiders aware of internal requirement breaches.

Conclusion

The director's role carries significant legal responsibilities under Malaysian law. The CA 2016 has strengthened the regulatory framework governing director conduct, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and proper corporate governance. Directors must remain vigilant about their legal obligations, as the consequences of breaches can be severe, affecting both their personal finances and professional standing. Regular training, proper record-keeping, and seeking professional advice when necessary are essential practices for directors navigating Malaysia's complex corporate legal landscape.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tax Audit - Amount Due To Director vs. Due From Director

In corporate accounting in Malaysia, it’s essential to distinguish between “Amount Due to Director” and “Amount Due from Director” because each carries different accounting and tax implications. When you record an “Amount Due to Director,” you are acknowledging a liability ( credit side of Trial Balance, same as Revenue, also on credit side )  on your company’s balance sheet. This relates to genuine obligations the company has toward a director, such as unpaid salaries, bonuses, or advances that have not yet been repaid. In this case, the company owes money to the director, and the transaction must be properly documented to show that the payment is a regular, legitimate expense. If not clearly identified, such liabilities might be scrutinised by LHDN (Malaysia Inland Revenue Board) to ensure they are not misclassified in an attempt to reduce taxable income or mask non-deductible expenses. In contrast, an “Amount Due from Director” represents a receivable, meaning that the director...
Read more

Close down LLP -- Winding Up Process and Procedure

Image
To wind up a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) in Malaysia, the process involves several steps governed by the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2012 and requires coordination with various authorities, notably the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) and the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM).  Here’s a detailed overview of the winding-up process: : : The LLP must be dormant, meaning it should not be carrying on any business or operations. All bank accounts must be closed, and there should be no assets or liabilities remaining. : Ensure that all debts, liabilities, and penalties under the LLP Act have been settled. This includes any outstanding tax obligations with LHDN. : All relevant employee registrations (EPF, SOCSO, EIS) must be closed before proceeding with the application for winding up. : Submit the final tax return (Form PT and Form E) to LHDN and obtain a written notice (CP7(PT) Form) confirming that there are no objections to the dissolution of the LLP....
Read more

Company Constitution - Why, when and how.

Image
  Understanding the Role of a Constitution in Malaysian Companies:  When and Why a Company Secretary Recommends Adoption The Constitution of a company serves as its foundational governance document, outlining the rules and procedures for internal management. In Malaysia, under the Companies Act 2016 (CA 2016) , companies are no longer mandated to adopt a constitution, marking a shift from the previous regime that required a Memorandum and Articles of Association (M&A). However, a constitution remains a critical tool for structuring a company’s operations, particularly in complex or shareholder-sensitive scenarios. As a Company Secretary (CoSec) , advising on its adoption requires balancing regulatory compliance, practical governance needs, and stakeholder interests. This article explores the circumstances under which a constitution is recommended, its benefits, and how its adoption aligns with corporate best practices in Malaysia. Extract of CA2016 1. What is a Consti...
Read more