Company Constitution - Why, when and how.

 Understanding the Role of a Constitution in Malaysian Companies:

 When and Why a Company Secretary Recommends Adoption

The Constitution of a company serves as its foundational governance document, outlining the rules and procedures for internal management. In Malaysia, under the Companies Act 2016 (CA 2016), companies are no longer mandated to adopt a constitution, marking a shift from the previous regime that required a Memorandum and Articles of Association (M&A). However, a constitution remains a critical tool for structuring a company’s operations, particularly in complex or shareholder-sensitive scenarios. As a Company Secretary (CoSec), advising on its adoption requires balancing regulatory compliance, practical governance needs, and stakeholder interests. This article explores the circumstances under which a constitution is recommended, its benefits, and how its adoption aligns with corporate best practices in Malaysia.

Extract of CA2016

1. What is a Constitution?

Under the CA 2016, a constitution is a document that governs a company’s internal affairs. It may include:
    • Rights and duties of shareholders, directors, and officers.
    • Decision-making processes (e.g., voting thresholds, board quorum).
    • Transfer of shares, dividend policies, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
    • Custom rules tailored to the company’s unique requirements.
If no constitution is adopted, the default provisions of the CA 2016 apply. For instance, Section 31(1) states that companies may operate under the Act’s default rules unless they opt for a constitution.

2. When Does a Company Secretary Recommend Adopting a Constitution?

A Company Secretary typically recommends adopting a constitution in the following scenarios:
A. Shareholder Agreements or Complex Ownership Structures
    • Joint ventures or partnerships with nuanced profit-sharing or decision-making arrangements may require a constitution to codify agreements (e.g., veto rights for minority shareholders).
    • Family-owned businesses often use constitutions to formalize succession plans or prevent disputes among heirs.
Example: A tech startup with multiple investors might use a constitution to specify conditions for share buybacks or dilution.
B. Regulatory Compliance or Industry Requirements
    • Licensed entities (e.g., financial institutions) may need stricter governance rules to comply with regulatory bodies like Bank Negara Malaysia.
    • Public-listed companies often adopt constitutions to align with Bursa Malaysia’s listing requirements.
C. Enhanced Governance and Dispute Mitigation
    • To override default CA 2016 provisions that may not suit the company (e.g., adjusting director appointment processes).
    • Prevent deadlocks by specifying alternative dispute resolution methods.
D. Foreign Ownership or Cross-Border Operations
    • Foreign shareholders may demand a constitution to align governance with international standards.

3. Benefits of Adopting a Constitution

A. Clarity and Certainty in Governance
A constitution formalizes roles and processes, reducing ambiguity. For example:
    • Voting thresholds for major decisions (e.g., mergers) can be set higher than the default simple majority.
    • Director duties can be expanded or restricted to match the company’s risk appetite.
B. Dispute Resolution Framework
    • Specifying mediation or arbitration procedures can save time and costs compared to litigation.
    • Tag-along/drag-along rights protect minority shareholders during acquisitions.
C. Customization for Unique Needs
    • Startups can include clauses for intellectual property ownership or employee profit-sharing.
    • Charitable companies may restrict profit distribution to comply with NGO regulations.
D. Investor Confidence
A robust constitution signals professionalism and transparency, attracting investors who prioritize governance.
E. Regulatory Alignment
    • Facilitates compliance with sector-specific laws (e.g., requirements for licensed insurers under the Financial Services Act 2013).

4. Case Study: When a Constitution is Critical

Consider a Malaysian joint venture (JV) between a local firm and a foreign entity. The JV’s success depends on balanced decision-making. A constitution could:
    • Require unanimous board approval for capital expenditures above RM 1 million.
    • Outline exit mechanisms if performance targets are unmet.
    • Define confidentiality obligations to protect proprietary technology.
Without a constitution, disputes over such issues would default to the CA 2016, which may not address the JV’s unique needs.

5. Risks of Not Adopting a Constitution

    • Over-reliance on default rules, which may not fit the company’s operational model.
    • Increased litigation risk if stakeholders misinterpret their rights.
    • Difficulty attracting strategic investors who prefer documented governance frameworks.

6. How a Company Secretary Facilitates Adoption

    • Needs Assessment: Analyze the company’s structure, industry, and stakeholder expectations.
    • Drafting: Tailor clauses to address specific risks (e.g., shareholder exits, director liability).
    • Stakeholder Alignment: Facilitate discussions between directors and shareholders to ensure buy-in.
    • Post-Adoption Compliance: Update statutory registers and ensure ongoing adherence to the constitution.

Conclusion

While the CA 2016 provides flexibility by not mandating a constitution, its adoption remains a strategic tool for companies seeking tailored governance. 

A Company Secretary plays a pivotal role in evaluating whether the benefits of customization such as dispute prevention, regulatory alignment, and investor confidence outweigh the simplicity of relying on default provisions. For businesses with complex structures, shareholder diversity, or regulatory obligations, a constitution is not just advisable but essential for sustainable governance. By integrating legal expertise with practical insights, a CoSec ensures the constitution becomes a living document that evolves alongside the company’s growth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tax Audit - Amount Due To Director vs. Due From Director

In corporate accounting in Malaysia, it’s essential to distinguish between “Amount Due to Director” and “Amount Due from Director” because each carries different accounting and tax implications. When you record an “Amount Due to Director,” you are acknowledging a liability ( credit side of Trial Balance, same as Revenue, also on credit side )  on your company’s balance sheet. This relates to genuine obligations the company has toward a director, such as unpaid salaries, bonuses, or advances that have not yet been repaid. In this case, the company owes money to the director, and the transaction must be properly documented to show that the payment is a regular, legitimate expense. If not clearly identified, such liabilities might be scrutinised by LHDN (Malaysia Inland Revenue Board) to ensure they are not misclassified in an attempt to reduce taxable income or mask non-deductible expenses. In contrast, an “Amount Due from Director” represents a receivable, meaning that the director...
Read more

Close down LLP -- Winding Up Process and Procedure

Image
To wind up a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) in Malaysia, the process involves several steps governed by the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2012 and requires coordination with various authorities, notably the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) and the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM).  Here’s a detailed overview of the winding-up process: : : The LLP must be dormant, meaning it should not be carrying on any business or operations. All bank accounts must be closed, and there should be no assets or liabilities remaining. : Ensure that all debts, liabilities, and penalties under the LLP Act have been settled. This includes any outstanding tax obligations with LHDN. : All relevant employee registrations (EPF, SOCSO, EIS) must be closed before proceeding with the application for winding up. : Submit the final tax return (Form PT and Form E) to LHDN and obtain a written notice (CP7(PT) Form) confirming that there are no objections to the dissolution of the LLP....
Read more

Understanding Audit Exemption for SMEs in Malaysia: Why, What, and FAQs

  Audit exemption is becoming a widely discussed topic among SMEs in Malaysia, especially with the latest updates by the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM) through Practice Directive (PD) 10/2024 , effective from 1 January 2025.  SME owners need to clearly understand what audit exemption entails, the rationale behind it, and whether opting for exemption genuinely translates into tangible compliance cost savings. Why Audit Exemption—The Rationale The audit exemption framework in Malaysia was originally introduced on 4 August 2017 and recently expanded under the Practice Directive 10/2024 . Its main purpose is clear: To reduce the financial and administrative burdens of compliance, especially for micro and small private entities. To streamline administrative processes, improve efficiency, and enhance Malaysia’s competitive advantage as a business-friendly environment. ...
Read more